Availability of Domestic Animals
The Factors Discussed are Meant to be Examples, Not Exhaustive
Number of Domestic Animals Available at a Given Point
- Comparing the Number of Domestic Animals in the Inventories of Francis and John Chadds
- Cattle: Francis Chadds: 21 in 1713; John Chadds: 4 first choice milch cows, 1 red cow, 1 yearling Bull and 1 yearling steer, 1 brown steer, 4 spring calves, 7 fat cattle in 1760
- Swine: Francis Chadds: 30 in 1713; John Chadds: 2 swine, 1 sow and 6 shoats, 4 swine in the pen in 1760
- Sheep: Francis Chadds: 44 sheep in 1713; John Chadds: 15 sheep, 5 dito at one McCoys
Productivity of the Animals
- Decrease in the Number of Cattle, Swine, and Sheep Registered between the Inventories of Francis and John Chadds! No mention of the number of chickens owned by the Chadds
- Was the decrease more gradual or instantaneous?
- Factors that could have played a role in the decrease?
External Forces
- Weather
- Cattle and Sheep Struggling to Survive in the Cold Weather
- Not mentioned as a Problem for Swine
- Influence of Natural Disasters: August 11, 1765: Flooding Destroying Cellers (Elizabeth Drinker Diary p121)
- Wild Animals
- Cattle: Wolves Attacking Calves
- Swine: Bears, Wolves, Panthers (Bear being the Primary Concern)
- Sheep: Wolves, Bears, Dogs (Wolves Causing the Most Damage
- Chickens: Weasels, Red Fox, Wildcats
- War Losses: Battle of Brandywine
- Butter and Smoked Beef among the Items Listed that were Taken from Chadds Ford after the Battle of the Brandywine
- Cheese Taken: 4,627 Pounds or 2.3 Tons Taken.
- Cattle: 177 Cattle were claimed lost in the landmark area, with 75% of those from Birmingham. The 133 Birmingham cattle lost comprised 24% of all Chester County cattle losses and probably close to 81% of total cattle population in Birmingham Township.
- Pigs: Similar losses to those of cattle.
- Sheep: Similar losses to those of cattle and pigs.
- Chickens: Numerous fowl reported lost.
- General Neglect of Animals by Owners
- General Neglect of Cattle and Sheep by Owners in Terms of Poor Shelter and Food Choices
Time of Year
- Climate Factoring in how Comfortable Domestic Animals were in Pennsylvania
- Time of Year Influencing what Food Options were Available for the Domestic Animals
Other Uses for Domestic Animals
- Use of Cows as a Source of Meat, Production of Milk, or Motor Power
- Sheep's Primary Role as Providing Wool Instead of Meat
- Use of Chickens' Feathers and Controlling Insects in Gardens
Sources: The Diary of Elizabeth Drinker p121; Chadds Ford Historical Society's Guide Training Manual p72-75, A-32-A-34; "Here a Chick, There a Chick, Everywhere a Chick, Chick."; Pennsylvania Agriculture and Country Life: 1640-1840 p67-76, 174-196, 202-203; and PAST MASTERS NEWS Volume 2, Issue 3, p9-10 (See Bibliography)
No comments:
Post a Comment